http://leicestershire-wedding-photographers.com/2009/10/19/photography-and-the-signing-of-the-register/ Steve Walton's Wedding Photography Blog. Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:20:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://leicestershire-wedding-photographers.com/2009/10/19/photography-and-the-signing-of-the-register/#comment-11 Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:20:16 +0000 http://leicestershire-wedding-photographers.com/?p=215#comment-11 As you gain more experience, you’ll find that the usual reason for not being allowed to photograph the signing is because of ‘….data protection….’. We then have to go through the farce of setting it up with a blank register page and a biro, because the celebrant thinks it is a good idea.
The result is that couples are disappointed and feel silly and the (genuine professional) photographer is irritated and frustrated by being tarred with an unwelcome brush.
However, given the crass stupidity of some ‘wedding photographers’ (and videographers), I can see why there is no set rule. Those celebrants who have had bad experiences at the hands of photographers and videographers will not allow photography, those who trust the photographer might allow it this time. Either way, it is encumbent upon you as the photographer to introduce yourself to the celebrant, establish their ground rules for the day and adhere to them. My approach has always been, and always will be, to remain professional throughout. As long as you make the couple aware of the situation, you have done your best. Transgress those variable ground rules and you deserve to pay the price.

]]> http://leicestershire-wedding-photographers.com/2009/10/19/photography-and-the-signing-of-the-register/#comment-10 Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:36:15 +0000 http://leicestershire-wedding-photographers.com/?p=215#comment-10 I get told that it is because they need to keep the details of the people who have signed above secret and private. An unscrupulous ‘tog can snap the register and blow it up later and commit identity theft. As if!!

]]>